Impacts of Climate Change in Determining the Ecological Reserve
- Tanner, Jane L, Griffin, Neil J, Slaughter, Andrew R, Mantel, Sukhmani K, Dabula, Pumza, Hughes, Denis A, Wolff, Margaret G
- Authors: Tanner, Jane L , Griffin, Neil J , Slaughter, Andrew R , Mantel, Sukhmani K , Dabula, Pumza , Hughes, Denis A , Wolff, Margaret G
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: To be catalogued
- Language: English
- Type: text , report
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/438128 , vital:73437 , ISBN 978-0-6392-0124-5 , https://wrcwebsite.azurewebsites.net/wp-content/uploads/mdocs/2834 final.pdf
- Description: The intermediate and long-term impacts of climate change require evaluation of the adaptive capacity of the riverine ecosystems to pro-mote sustainability. The predicted climate change impacts are the moti-vation behind the current research which targets the knowledge gap of the impacts of climate change on the ecological Reserve (or Ecological Water Requirements [EWR]). In order for the Department of Water and Sanitation (DWS) to meet their mandate to protect aquatic ecosystems, given the constraints of climate change, it is necessary to take cogni-sance of the implications of climate change and to make the necessary adjustments and changes to the ecological Reserve determination methodology. These adjustments will help ensure that sufficient water, at the right time, distributed in the right flow pattern and of adequate quality is provided, so that key ecological processes are sustained, and that biotic communities maintain their health and integrity.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
- Authors: Tanner, Jane L , Griffin, Neil J , Slaughter, Andrew R , Mantel, Sukhmani K , Dabula, Pumza , Hughes, Denis A , Wolff, Margaret G
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: To be catalogued
- Language: English
- Type: text , report
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/438128 , vital:73437 , ISBN 978-0-6392-0124-5 , https://wrcwebsite.azurewebsites.net/wp-content/uploads/mdocs/2834 final.pdf
- Description: The intermediate and long-term impacts of climate change require evaluation of the adaptive capacity of the riverine ecosystems to pro-mote sustainability. The predicted climate change impacts are the moti-vation behind the current research which targets the knowledge gap of the impacts of climate change on the ecological Reserve (or Ecological Water Requirements [EWR]). In order for the Department of Water and Sanitation (DWS) to meet their mandate to protect aquatic ecosystems, given the constraints of climate change, it is necessary to take cogni-sance of the implications of climate change and to make the necessary adjustments and changes to the ecological Reserve determination methodology. These adjustments will help ensure that sufficient water, at the right time, distributed in the right flow pattern and of adequate quality is provided, so that key ecological processes are sustained, and that biotic communities maintain their health and integrity.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2020
Understanding and modelling surface water-groundwater interactions
- Tanner, Jane L, Hughes, Denis A
- Authors: Tanner, Jane L , Hughes, Denis A
- Date: 2015
- Subjects: To be catalogued
- Language: English
- Type: text , report
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/438220 , vital:73444 , ISBN 978-1-4312-0630-8 , https://wrcwebsite.azurewebsites.net/wp-content/uploads/mdocs/2056%20-2-14.pdf
- Description: The main objective of the total project was to contribute to the incorpo-ration of uncertainty assessments in practical water resource decision making in South Africa. The companion report addresses more general issues of uncertainty and hydrological modelling, while this report con-centrates on the uncertainties in both understanding and modelling the interactions between surface water and groundwater. Since groundwa-ter routines were added into the widely used Pitman model in the early 2000s by both Prof Hughes and Mr Karim Sami, the approaches have come under a great deal of criticism mainly from the geohydrological community of specialists within South Africa. Arguably, a great deal of this criticism is based on misunderstandings of the intention of adding groundwater routines into an existing surface water model. It was stated quite clearly at the time that this approach was not seen as a replace-ment for existing detailed numerical approaches to groundwater model-ling. The intention was to create a scientific and practical tool that could be used to simulate the complete hydrological cycle at the catchment scale so that integrated water resources decision making could be better supported.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2015
- Authors: Tanner, Jane L , Hughes, Denis A
- Date: 2015
- Subjects: To be catalogued
- Language: English
- Type: text , report
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/438220 , vital:73444 , ISBN 978-1-4312-0630-8 , https://wrcwebsite.azurewebsites.net/wp-content/uploads/mdocs/2056%20-2-14.pdf
- Description: The main objective of the total project was to contribute to the incorpo-ration of uncertainty assessments in practical water resource decision making in South Africa. The companion report addresses more general issues of uncertainty and hydrological modelling, while this report con-centrates on the uncertainties in both understanding and modelling the interactions between surface water and groundwater. Since groundwa-ter routines were added into the widely used Pitman model in the early 2000s by both Prof Hughes and Mr Karim Sami, the approaches have come under a great deal of criticism mainly from the geohydrological community of specialists within South Africa. Arguably, a great deal of this criticism is based on misunderstandings of the intention of adding groundwater routines into an existing surface water model. It was stated quite clearly at the time that this approach was not seen as a replace-ment for existing detailed numerical approaches to groundwater model-ling. The intention was to create a scientific and practical tool that could be used to simulate the complete hydrological cycle at the catchment scale so that integrated water resources decision making could be better supported.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2015
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »