- Title
- The evaluation of continuous quality improvement amongst the Community Health Centers of Lukhanji sub-district, of Chris Hani District Municipality, Eastern Cape
- Creator
- Qotoyi, Ntombesitatu
- Description
- Continuous Quality Improvement is a system that seeks to improve the provision of services with an emphasis on future results (Tomey, 2009). It is a process that involves evaluation, actions and mindset to strive constantly for excellence (Sullivan, 2012). Evaluation of quality in health care has evolved into a dynamic and modern science which plays a significant role in patient safety, quality assurance (QA), benchmarking and continuous quality improvement (CQI). Improved quality has a positive impact on patient and staff satisfaction, improving the efficiency and effectiveness of healthcare provision in both the public and private sector, eventually leading to increased trust in the health system (Whittaker, Burns, Doyle and Fenney, 1998). The purpose of this study was to explore and describe the factors that influence continuous quality improvement amongst the Community Health Centers of Lukhanji sub district, of Chris Hani District Municipality, Eastern Cape. The standards of the community health centers were assessed against the National Core Standards of the South African National Department of Health. Donabedian‟s tripartite model (1988) which addresses three elements of quality assessment, namely structure, process and outcome, led this study. A quantitative, descriptive design was adapted, using National Core Standard checklists and assessment questionnaires to collect data from two community health centers. Respondents were sampled through simple random sample. Data were collected through staff and patient interviews, document reviews, patient record assessment and observations. The raw data were transferred to the District Health Information System (DHIS) Assessment Questionnaire CHC/CDC programme which generated the results into colour coded tables (dashboard view). According to DHIS software version: 1.4.1.12 data base version: 19 June 2013 each community health center is listed in the DHIS programme for each district to capture data. The researcher consolidated and interpreted the results according to the expected level of performance and compliance as per the South African Office of the Health Standard Compliance. The results highlighted a need for improvement in the six priority areas for the Community Health Centers (CHCs) to reach the acceptable performance of 80% and above. CHC A scored 85% in availability of medicines and supplies however CHC B obtained 68 %. For cleanliness both CHCs obtained 54% which need more than 20% effort to reach the acceptable performance of 80%. In patient safety CHC A obtained 48% whilst CHC B had a score of 36%. For infection prevention and control CHC A scored 61% and CHC B obtained 53%. In the assessment of positive and caring attitudes CHC A had a score of 77% whereas CHC B obtained 40% indicative of noncompliance. In waiting time measures CHC A was compliant with a score of 82% however CHC B had a score of 71%. The results of this study indicated that there is a need for the CHCs to put systems in place to strengthen PHC effectiveness and ensure patient safety. The results and recommendations would assist in service delivery and continuous quality improvement in the community health centers.
- Date
- 2015
- Subject
- Health Standard Compliance Health Care -- Quality improvement Community health centrers -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape
- Type
- Thesis, Masters/Doctoral, MSc Nursing
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/11260/1465
- Identifier
- vital:35973
- Format
- xxii, 240 leaves, pdf
- Publisher
- Walter Sisulu University, Faculty of Health Sciences
- Language
- English
- Rights
- Walter Sisulu University
- Hits: 921
- Visitors: 863
- Downloads: 257
Collections
WSU Department of Public Health
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| View Details | SOURCE1 | Qotoyi Ntombesitatu thesis MSc Nursing .pdf | 3 MB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details |